A8 · Playbook · HowTo schema
90-Day GTM Plan
From no repeatable motion to first $100k MRR
Days 1-30 — Diagnose and define
Before you can build a motion, you need to know who you are actually selling to and why they buy. Spend the first 30 days doing structured discovery, not selling. Complete 10+ discovery calls with current customers or high-intent prospects. Do not use a survey — get on the phone. Map the buying trigger (what event caused them to look for a solution), the decision-maker, the economic buyer, and the technical buyer for each deal. Document verbatim the language customers use to describe their problem — this language becomes your copy. Validate your pricing model: present three pricing tiers to 5 prospects and record where they hesitate. Set an ICP hypothesis as a falsifiable statement (e.g., 'VPs of Sales at Series B SaaS companies with 10-50 AEs who use Salesforce close within 30 days at $24k ACV'). Everything in the first 30 days is about generating clean data, not clean decks.
Deliverables
- ICP hypothesis documented as a falsifiable statement
- 10 discovery call notes synthesized into buying trigger map
- Pricing model validated with at least 5 prospects
- Top 3 objections documented with verbatim customer language
- Competitor landscape mapped (who else they evaluated and why)
Checkpoint
At day 30: you can state your ICP in one sentence, you have at least 2 closed deals or 3 verbal commitments at your target price, and your discovery calls have surfaced a consistent buying trigger. If you cannot pass all three, extend Phase 1 by two weeks before moving on.
Days 31-60 — Find the signal
With an ICP hypothesis in hand, run structured experiments to find which acquisition channel reaches your ICP at acceptable unit economics. Pick exactly two channels to test — not five. More channels means thinner experiments and inconclusive data. For each channel, define a success metric before you start (e.g., 'outbound to VP Sales at Series B: 8%+ reply rate and 2%+ meeting rate means the channel works'). Run outbound sequences to 100-200 ICP-fit accounts. Test one content distribution channel (LinkedIn posts, a community, or a partnership). Instrument your funnel: you need to know lead-to-meeting, meeting-to-opportunity, and opportunity-to-close rates for each channel separately. By day 60, one channel should be showing clear signal. If neither is, your ICP hypothesis is likely wrong — revisit Phase 1 findings before scaling spend.
Deliverables
- Two channel experiments running with pre-defined success metrics
- 100-200 accounts contacted via primary outbound channel
- Funnel metrics by channel: L2M, M2O, O2C rates documented
- At least 5 new pipeline opportunities created
- ICP hypothesis confirmed or revised with updated falsifiable statement
Checkpoint
At day 60: one channel has hit its pre-defined success metric, you have $150k+ in pipeline (at your target ACV), and your close rate on experiments is tracking above 15%. If pipeline is below $100k, you need a different channel or a revised ICP before proceeding to Phase 3.
Days 61-90 — Build the repeatable engine
Repeatability means you can onboard a new person and they can execute the motion without you. In Phase 3, you are building the process documentation and tooling that turns your Phase 2 signal into a machine. Document your winning sequence end-to-end: the research process, the messaging framework, the objection-handling scripts, and the handoff criteria from SDR to AE. Implement basic CRM hygiene — every deal in the pipeline needs a close date, a next step, and a decision-maker contact. Set up a weekly pipeline review cadence with a 60-second deal update format. Hire or assign one person to own the channel that showed signal. At day 90, your test for success is: can someone else run the channel for one week while you are offline, and does pipeline not drop? That is your definition of 'repeatable motion.'
Deliverables
- Sales playbook v1 documented (ICP, sequence, objection handling, handoff criteria)
- CRM hygiene enforced: all pipeline deals have close date + next step
- Weekly pipeline review cadence established with defined format
- One person assigned to own and run the winning channel
- Unit economics baseline: CAC, sales cycle, ACV, and payback period documented
Checkpoint
At day 90: $100k MRR achieved or clear path within 30 days (pipeline coverage of 3x target); motion is runnable without founder involvement for 5 business days; and CAC payback period is under 18 months. If payback is over 18 months, pricing or segmentation needs revision before you scale headcount.
Download
90-Day GTM Sprint Canvas: a single-page template with the three-phase framework, ICP hypothesis worksheet, channel experiment scorecard, and unit economics tracker. Designed to be completed weekly and reviewed at each phase checkpoint.
Related
How to cite
@misc{shalvi_gtm_playbook_90_day_gtm_plan_2026,
author = {Singh, Shalvi},
title = {90-Day GTM Plan},
year = {2026},
url = {https://shalvisingh.com/gtm/playbooks/90-day-gtm-plan}
} Singh, Shalvi. "90-Day GTM Plan." GTM World Model, shalvisingh.com, 2026. https://shalvisingh.com/gtm/playbooks/90-day-gtm-plan